How to write critically

Have you ever been told that your writing is “too descriptive” or that you need to “show more analysis” or “adopt a more critical approach”? You may need to work on your critical thinking skills..... By Clinton Bell

‘Critical thinking’ does not mean being negative! In an academic context, being critical means that you don’t just accept things at face value. At school you might have focused on memorising the ‘right answer’, but at university there is more emphasis on being able to determine for yourself whether you should believe something and how certain you can be.

To do this, you need to go beyond just describing what other people have said, and start asking questions. There are a lot of questions you can ask, but let’s start with two big ones: “Why should I believe this?” and “What does that mean?”

Why should I believe a particular article?

It’s a sad fact that you can’t believe everything you read. This means two things for your writing:
  • you need to explain why your reader should believe you
  • you need to consider how credible your sources are.
As a student, the most common way to support what you say is to refer to evidence from other sources and making a logical argument based on that evidence. This leads directly into the second point: you need to choose your sources carefully, because the strength of your own argument depends on them!

If you’re not sure how to do this, check out the Evaluating sources section of the Library’s Academic research on the internet tutorial. Although it’s aimed at internet sources, it’s a useful guide in general.

What does that mean?

So you’ve got some high-quality sources. Great! But remember, we’re trying to make an argument based on evidence, not just provide a big list of information. That means we need to link our sources back to our topic and to each other. Again, asking questions is a great way to do this:

  • How does this information relate to the topic at hand?
  • What conclusions can we draw from it?
  • Are there any alternative explanations?
  • These two sources disagree. Why is that?
  • Should we believe one over the other – or perhaps they both have some merit? What are the implications of accepting one or the other?

Don’t be afraid to show original thought! If you just repeat what someone else has said, what do you accomplish? Why wouldn’t I just read the original source? Instead, you need to build on your sources and add value through analysis or critique or interpretation.

Further reading

If you’re still not sure where to start, there are several resources on the web that can help!
Do you know of any other useful resources? Let us know by commenting here or on Twitter @monashunilib.

Share on Google Plus

About Rosemary Miller

This is a short description in the author block about the author. You edit it by entering text in the "Biographical Info" field in the user admin panel.


Post a Comment